ABSTRACT
Since 2020, COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide causing a huge number of cases and casualties. Among direct anti SARS-CoV-2 agents available for the treatment of COVID-19, only remdesivir and casirivimab/imdevimab have been approved for severe disease. As they act at different levels in blocking viral replication, it is theoretically possible to combine them. In this case series we describe tolerability, safety and effectiveness in a small group of 14 patients of the combination of casirivimab/imdevimab monoclonal antibodies with the polymerase inhibitor remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective study among consecutive patients admitted to the Infectious Disease ward of the University of Naples (Italy) Hospital for COVID-19 that received the combination of casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir for the treatment of severe COVID-19 from the August 1, 2021 to the November 30, 2021. During the study period, 78 patients were admitted for severe COVID-19. Fourteen patients (18%) received the combination casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir. They were five males and nine females with a median age of 54 years. Eight patients had significant comorbidities; three patients were in the immediate post-partum period. No adverse drug reaction was observed. All patients except one improved clinical condition and respiratory parameters within seven days following the therapy. All patients were discharged in good conditions.
ABSTRACT
Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir were the first available oral antivirals (OAs) active against SARS-CoV-2. Trials evaluating the efficacy of OAs involved patients unvaccinated and infected with variants different from those currently circulating. We conducted a retrospective study on patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with OAs during the omicron surge in Italy in order to provide real-life data on the efficacy and safety of OAs during the omicron surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among 257 patients, 56.8% received molnupiravir, while 43.2% received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Patients in the molnupiravir group were older, had a lower body mass index, and had a higher rate of chronic heart disease than those treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Three hospitalizations were recorded in the molnupiravir (2.1%) group and one in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (0.9%) group. One patient treated with molnupiravir died. The median time to negativity was 8 days in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group vs. 10 days in the molnupiravir group, p < 0.01. We recorded 37 ADRs (mainly dysgeusia, diarrhea, and nausea) in 31 individuals (12.1%). Only two patients (0.8%) treated with molnupiravir terminated treatment due to ADRs. In conclusion, in a population of mostly vaccinated patients treated with OAs, we observed a low rate of hospitalization, death, and adverse drug reactions. These rates were lower than those reported in pivotal trials.